Field Development Plan — Trident

Generated by the worldenergydata field-development playbook (epic #567). Recommendation is heuristic (Concept Select / FEL-1 fidelity), not a sanctioned design.

Engineering rationale

No as-built concept is recorded for this matched field. The engine's top recommendation on the field inputs is Subsea To Shore (Concept-Select fidelity).

Field parameters

Water depth
2953.0 m
Concept
—
Fluid
oil
Operator
—
Wells
—
Plateau
—
Tieback
—
First oil
—

Recommended concept shortlist

ConceptScoreTreesRationale / flags
subsea_to_shore0.688wet—
fpso0.602wet— atypical concept for gom
flng0.531wet— atypical concept for gom

★ = the concept actually selected for this field (where known).

Economics & execution (engine estimate)

Dev system
subsea20
Est. CAPEX
450.0 $MM
Est. NPV
—
Install vessels
8
Max crane
5000.0 t
Hardware
RJ-08-HYD-15K

As built (actuals)

Block
Alaminos Canyon 903, 904, 947
BSEE code
AC903
Operator
—
Concept (as built)
—
Engine top pick
Subsea To Shore

Architecture & layout (subsea_to_shore)

Subsea architecture — Trident flowline umbilical jumper control jumper control jumper control jumper control Onshore Terminal Manifold 1 XT 1 XT 2 XT 3 XT 4
Subsea architecture block diagram
Field layout — Trident Subsea manifold Manifold 1 Subsea tree (wet XT) XT 1 Subsea tree (wet XT) XT 2 Subsea tree (wet XT) XT 3 Subsea tree (wet XT) XT 4 Onshore terminal Onshore Terminal N 1 km
Plan-view field layout (to scale)

Sources: SubseaIQ field catalog (~2014) + BSEE + curated vessel/ subsea catalogs. Schematics are deterministic, generated from the field concept.