Generated by the worldenergydata field-development playbook (epic #567). Recommendation is heuristic (Concept Select / FEL-1 fidelity), not a sanctioned design.
The engine's top recommendation (Subsea Tieback) matches the concept actually built (Subsea Tieback). The recommendation is produced on a blind probe — the as-built concept is stripped before scoring — so the agreement reflects the depth, basin and host-proximity signal, not the answer.
| Concept | Score | Trees | Rationale / flags |
|---|---|---|---|
| subsea_tieback ★ | 0.874 | wet | typical of gom development practice; host within 60 km with spare capacity |
| subsea_to_shore | 0.688 | wet | — |
| fpso | 0.602 | wet | — atypical concept for gom |
| flng | 0.531 | wet | — atypical concept for gom |
★ = the concept actually selected for this field (where known).
Sources: SubseaIQ field catalog (~2014) + BSEE + curated vessel/ subsea catalogs. Schematics are deterministic, generated from the field concept.