Generated by the worldenergydata field-development playbook (epic #567). Recommendation is heuristic (Concept Select / FEL-1 fidelity), not a sanctioned design.
The engine's top recommendation (Tlp) differs from the concept actually built (Subsea Tieback). The recommendation is produced on a blind probe (the as-built concept stripped before scoring); the shortlist below shows where the built concept ranks. Divergence is expected where the real choice turned on data outside the engine's inputs (reserves, schedule, operator preference).
| Concept | Score | Trees | Rationale / flags |
|---|---|---|---|
| tlp | 0.783 | dry | typical of gom development practice |
| subsea_to_shore | 0.688 | wet | — |
| compliant_tower | 0.661 | dry | — |
| fpso | 0.533 | wet | — atypical concept for gom |
| flng | 0.462 | wet | — atypical concept for gom |
★ = the concept actually selected for this field (where known).
Sources: SubseaIQ field catalog (~2014) + BSEE + curated vessel/ subsea catalogs. Schematics are deterministic, generated from the field concept.