worldenergydata · Gulf of Mexico · Lower-Tertiary play

The Lower-Tertiary Drilling Learning Curve

Across 12 Paleogene fields, 184 development wellbores burned 11,124 rig-days (30.5 rig-years) of drilling — a median of 46.5 days per wellbore (IQR 19–82). Each extra 1,000 ft of true vertical depth adds only about 3.3 drilling days, and TVD explains just 11% of the spread (r²=0.11): in this play field execution and hole trouble — not depth — drive the learning curve.

Wellbores (drill-days derivable)
184 / 217
Total rig-days
11,124 d
Median drill-days
46.5 (mean 60.5)
Median completion-days
33.0 (n=186)
Days per 1,000 ft TVD
3.3 r²=0.11
Median mud weight
16.8 ppg (max 20.0)
Median water depth
6,820 ft (max 9,525)
Deepest wellbore TVD
35,115 ft

Learning curve

Drilling days vs true vertical depth

Each dot is one of the 184 wellbores with both a recorded drilling duration and a TVD. The dashed line is the least-squares fit (slope 3.3 days per 1,000 ft, r²=0.11); the highlighted point is the deepest hole, North Platte 004 at 35,115 ft TVD, drilled in only 50 days — deeper is not automatically slower.

Lower-Tertiary drilling learning curve: days vs TVD0761522283043804.0k9.3k14.7k20.0k25.3k30.7k36.0kMax wellbore TVD (ft)Drilling days
Drilling days vs max wellbore TVD, 184 GoM Lower-Tertiary wellbores. The weak fit (r²=0.11) is the point: depth sets a floor, execution sets the spread.

By field

Median drilling days by field

Field medians range from 28.0 days (Chinook) to 107.0 days (Tiber) — a 3.8× spread across the same play, at broadly similar depths.

Median drilling days by fieldChinook28.0 d (n=5)St Malo30.0 d (n=57)Big Foot36.5 d (n=24)Kaskida37.0 d (n=7)North Platte46.5 d (n=12)Anchor51.0 d (n=13)Jack58.0 d (n=8)Shenandoah69.0 d (n=17)Stones71.0 d (n=21)Cascade71.0 d (n=9)Julia96.0 d (n=9)Tiber107.0 d (n=2)
Median drilling days per field (n = wellbores with a derivable duration). St Malo's low median reflects many short re-entry / sidetrack intervals in a 65-wellbore program.

Repetition vs step-out

What actually drives drilling days — repetition vs step-out

Ordering each field's wells by spud date and splitting them in half, the honest signal is depth-normalized: rig-days per 1,000 ft TVD (dpk), first-half median vs last-half median. That controls for a field simply moving to shallower targets. Of the 11 fields with n ≥ 4 datable wells, 5 learned (dpk fell >10%), 4 stepped out (dpk rose >10%), and 2 held flat.

Change in depth-normalized drilling intensity, first half vs last half← faster (learning)slower (step-out) →Chinook-67% (n=5)Shenandoah-57% (n=17)St Malo-32% (n=57)Stones-27% (n=21)North Platte-26% (n=12)Kaskida-1% (n=7)Big Foot+7% (n=24)Jack+29% (n=8)Julia+45% (n=9)Anchor+119% (n=13)Cascade+266% (n=9)
Percent change in depth-normalized drilling intensity (rig-days per 1,000 ft TVD), first half → last half of each field's spud-ordered wells. Green = repetition compounding; red = step-outs into new fault blocks resetting the clock.

St Malo spotlight — why depth-normalizing matters

Across St Malo's 57 wells, raw drilling time looks like a clean win — first-half median 42 days falling to 19 days (-54% raw). But the last-half wells are ~5,078 ft shallower (TVD drift -5,078 ft), so a good chunk of that speed-up is just easier holes. Depth-normalized, the real, defensible learning is -32% — 1.6 → 1.1 rig-days per 1,000 ft.

Repetition compounds: 5 fields cut depth-normalized drilling intensity 26–67% (Chinook -67%, Shenandoah -57%, St Malo -32%, Stones -27%, North Platte -26%). Step-outs reset the clock: 4 fields worsened by +29–266% as they pushed into new fault blocks and reservoir compartments (Cascade +266%, Anchor +119%, Julia +45%, Jack +29%).

Honest note: this is depth-normalized and limited to fields with n ≥ 4 datable wells. Pooled across every well-in-sequence, the learning trend is weak (r ≈ -0.28 over 182 wells, -1.1 days per additional well) — so the thesis is not “wells always get faster,” but rather that repetition within a known block compounds while step-outs pay the first-well tax again.

Mud program

Mud weight vs depth

Maximum drilling-fluid weight rises with depth as pore-pressure ramps in the Paleogene section — median 16.8 ppg, topping out at 20.0 ppg. 5 readings outside the physical 9–22 ppg band (including one 80 ppg keying error) are excluded as data errors.

Mud weight vs depth911131618204.0k9.3k14.7k20.0k25.3k30.7k36.0kMax wellbore TVD (ft)Max mud weight (ppg)
Max mud weight (ppg) vs max wellbore TVD, 175 wellbores with a valid reading.

Fastest

Quickest wellbores

FieldWellDrill d TVD ftWD ft
St MaloPS004123,9246,820
Stones008111,2269,525
Stones009111,2309,525
Big Foot00128,1505,190
Big Foot002222,1375,190

Sub-3-day entries at deep TVD are re-entry / completion-only intervals, not full wells — the duration is real but the scope is partial.

Slowest

Longest wellbores

FieldWellDrill d TVD ftWD ft
Kaskida00236431,3755,860
Jack00322628,2387,240
CascadeCA00622226,9698,200
CascadeCA00320926,8048,200
St MaloPS00220028,4986,820

The slowest hole, Kaskida 002, took 364 days — 7.8× the play median.

Field table

Per-field drilling summary

FieldWellbores Median dTotal rig-d Median TVD ft
Chinook528.031726,222
St Malo5730.02,29728,049
Big Foot2436.51,20722,338
Kaskida737.055631,375
North Platte1246.567533,460
Anchor1351.082133,367
Jack858.065228,278
Shenandoah1769.01,23831,025
Stones2171.01,45727,488
Cascade971.088826,685
Julia996.080230,334
Tiber2107.021432,944